Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0260798, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1599553

ABSTRACT

Despite remarkable academic efforts, why Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) post-implementation success occurs still remains elusive. A reason for this shortage may be the insufficient addressing of an ERP-specific interior boundary condition, i.e., the multi-stakeholder perspective, in explaining this phenomenon. This issue may entail a gap between how ERP success is supposed to occur and how ERP success may actually occur, leading to theoretical inconsistency when investigating its causal roots. Through a case-based, inductive approach, this manuscript presents an ERP success causal network that embeds the overlooked boundary condition and offers a theoretical explanation of why the most relevant observed causal relationships may occur. The results provide a deeper understanding of the ERP success causal mechanisms and informative managerial suggestions to steer ERP initiatives towards long-haul success.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational/standards , Financial Management, Hospital/methods , Health Care Rationing/standards , Health Resources/organization & administration , Hospital Information Systems/standards , Resource Allocation/methods , Humans , Planning Techniques , Software
4.
Fam Pract ; 38(Suppl 1): i16-i22, 2021 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1376298

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pandemics threaten lives and economies. This article addresses the global threat of the anticipated overlap of COVID-19 with seasonal-influenza. OBJECTIVES: Scientific evidence based on simulation methodology is presented to reveal the impact of a dual outbreak, with scenarios intended for propagation analysis. This article aims at researchers, clinicians of family medicine, general practice and policy-makers worldwide. The implications for the clinical practice of primary health care are discussed. Current research is an effort to explore new directions in epidemiology and health services delivery. METHODS: Projections consisted of machine learning, dynamic modelling algorithms and whole simulations. Input data consisted of global indicators of infectious diseases. Four simulations were run for '20% versus 60% flu-vaccinated populations' and '10 versus 20 personal contacts'. Outputs consisted of numerical values and mathematical graphs. Outputs consisted of numbers for 'never infected', 'vaccinated', 'infected/recovered', 'symptomatic/asymptomatic' and 'deceased' individuals. Peaks, percentages, R0, durations are reported. RESULTS: The best-case scenario was one with a higher flu-vaccination rate and fewer contacts. The reverse generated the worst outcomes, likely to disrupt the provision of vital community services. Both measures were proven effective; however, results demonstrated that 'increasing flu-vaccination rates' is a more powerful strategy than 'limiting social contacts'. CONCLUSIONS: Results support two affordable preventive measures: (i) to globally increase influenza-vaccination rates, (ii) to limit the number of personal contacts during outbreaks. The authors endorse changing practices and research incentives towards multidisciplinary collaborations. The urgency of the situation is a call for international health policy to promote interdisciplinary modern technologies in public health engineering.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Global Health , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Public Health Practice , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Computer Simulation , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pandemics , Planning Techniques , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Rev Bras Enferm ; 74Suppl 1(Suppl 1): e20200281, 2021.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1090511

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to report the experience of professors and students of a graduate course on nursing care in coping with the new coronavirus (COVID-19) based on Self-Care Theory. METHOD: the active methodologies used were a literature search and seminar presentations, with an understanding of Orem's theoretical concepts: health; man; self-care; universal, developmental and health deviation requirements; self-care activities; self-care deficits; the required therapeutic demand; nursing systems. The pandemic was considered a health deviation that requires critical thinking and nursing care planning. Methodological frameworks to classify nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes were used. RESULTS: for each health deviation, nursing systems were identified; self-care deficits, diagnoses; actions, interventions; and the form of assessment, outcomes. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: theoretical-practical reflections of the academic context support nursing care planning.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/nursing , Education, Nursing, Graduate/organization & administration , Nursing Care/standards , Planning Techniques , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Brazil , Curriculum , Female , Health Policy , Humans , Male , Nursing Theory , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
8.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 17(11): 1460-1468, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1065254

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has greatly affected demand for imaging services, with marked reductions in demand for elective imaging and image-guided interventional procedures. To guide radiology planning and recovery from this unprecedented impact, three recovery models were developed to predict imaging volume over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) a long-term volume model with three scenarios based on prior disease outbreaks and other historical analogues, to aid in long-term planning when the pandemic was just beginning; (2) a short-term volume model based on the supply-demand approach, leveraging increasingly available COVID-19 data points to predict examination volume on a week-to-week basis; and (3) a next-wave model to estimate the impact from future COVID-19 surges. The authors present these models as techniques that can be used at any stage in an unpredictable pandemic timeline.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Services Needs and Demand , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Workload , Boston/epidemiology , Forecasting , Humans , Models, Organizational , Pandemics , Planning Techniques , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 19(2): 181-190, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1023373

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Germany is experiencing the second COVID-19 pandemic wave. The intensive care unit (ICU) bed capacity is an important consideration in the response to the pandemic. The purpose of this study was to determine the costs and benefits of maintaining or expanding a staffed ICU bed reserve capacity in Germany. METHODS: This study compared the provision of additional capacity to no intervention from a societal perspective. A decision model was developed using, e.g. information on age-specific fatality rates, ICU costs and outcomes, and the herd protection threshold. The net monetary benefit (NMB) was calculated based upon the willingness to pay for new medicines for the treatment of cancer, a condition with a similar disease burden in the near term. RESULTS: The marginal cost-effectiveness ratio (MCER) of the last bed added to the existing ICU capacity is €21,958 per life-year gained assuming full bed utilization. The NMB decreases with an additional expansion but remains positive for utilization rates as low as 2%. In a sensitivity analysis, the variables with the highest impact on the MCER were the mortality rates in the ICU and after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This article demonstrates the applicability of cost-effectiveness analysis to policies of hospital pandemic preparedness and response capacity strengthening. In Germany, the provision of a staffed ICU bed reserve capacity appears to be cost-effective even for a low probability of bed utilization.


Subject(s)
Bed Occupancy/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units/economics , Planning Techniques , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Radiol Technol ; 92(2): 100-112, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-932025

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine radiologic science programs' mitigation activities and educators' experiences related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response planning. METHODS: Using a mixed-methods approach, educators in magnetic resonance, medical dosimetry, radiation therapy, and radiography programs were surveyed to capture their experiences and mitigation strategies related to COVID-19 response planning. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics and percentages. Thematic analyses were performed on the qualitative responses. RESULTS: A total of 274 educators responded. Educators reported being somewhat comfortable with modifying clinical experiences (79, 28.8%), moderately comfortable with adjusting assessment procedures (112, 40.9%), and extremely comfortable with changing delivery of didactic content (115, 42%). Incidentally, 220 (80.3%) educators thought adjusting to a new course delivery approach (eg, face-to-face to online format) was the greatest challenge for faculty during the pandemic. Notably, half of the educators in this study questioned the quality of online (remote) learning. Specific to program policies, educators indicated that access restrictions to campus buildings (263, 96%) and removal of students from clinical sites (254, 92.7%) were implemented during the pandemic. DISCUSSION: Educators self-reported a moderate to strong comfort level with curricular modification. The area of modification that yielded the most uncertainty arose from alterations of clinical experiences. Thematic analyses revealed concerns related to personal protective equipment procurement and clinical sites prohibiting students from completing rotations. However, educators created innovative alternatives to enhance clinical education by providing simulations, case study analyses, and virtual tours of facilities during the pandemic. Securing educational technology resources, such as lockdown browser software, and working with institutional instructional designers might provide some resolution to educators' concerns regarding the quality of online (remote) learning. CONCLUSION: Archiving radiologic science programs' COVID-19 response efforts is important. The compilation of mitigation strategies will inform and guide programs on contingency planning for future pandemic and emergent conditions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Curriculum/trends , Infection Control/organization & administration , Schools, Health Occupations/organization & administration , Technology, Radiologic/education , Humans , Planning Techniques , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
12.
Heart Lung Circ ; 29(11): 1588-1595, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-728566

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in Australia. Investment in research solutions has been demonstrated to yield health and a 9.8-fold return economic benefit. The sector, however, is severely challenged with success rates of traditional peer-reviewed funding in decline. Here, we aimed to understand the perceived challenges faced by the cardiovascular workforce in Australia prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We used an online survey distributed across Australian cardiovascular societies/councils, universities and research institutes over a period of 6 months during 2019, with 548 completed responses. Inclusion criteria included being an Australian resident or an Australian citizen who lived overseas, and a current or past student or employee in the field of cardiovascular research. RESULTS: The mean age of respondents was 42±13 years, 47% were male, 85% had a full-time position, and 40% were a group leader or laboratory head. Twenty-three per cent (23%) had permanent employment, and 82% of full-time workers regularly worked >40 hours/week. Sixty-eight per cent (68%) said they had previously considered leaving the cardiovascular research sector. If their position could not be funded in the next few years, a staggering 91% of respondents would leave the sector. Compared to PhD- and age-matched men, women were less likely to be a laboratory head and to feel they had a long-term career path as a cardiovascular researcher, while more women were unsure about future employment and had considered leaving the sector (all p<0.05). Greater job security (76%) and government and philanthropic investment in cardiovascular research (72%) were highlighted by responders as the main changes to current practices that would encourage them to stay. CONCLUSION: Strategic solutions, such as diversification of career pathways and funding sources, and moving from a competitive to a collaborative culture, need to be a priority to decrease reliance on government funding and allow cardiovascular researchers to thrive.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Cardiovascular Diseases , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Financial Management , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Research Personnel , Research Support as Topic , Workforce , Adult , Australia , Betacoronavirus , Biomedical Research/economics , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Biomedical Research/trends , COVID-19 , Employment/economics , Employment/psychology , Female , Financial Management/methods , Financial Management/organization & administration , Financial Management/statistics & numerical data , Financing, Government , Humans , Male , Organizational Culture , Pandemics , Planning Techniques , Research Personnel/economics , Research Personnel/psychology , Research Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Research Support as Topic/organization & administration , Research Support as Topic/trends , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workforce/statistics & numerical data
13.
Prehosp Disaster Med ; 35(4): 451-453, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-546918

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), a new respiratory disease, is spreading globally. In France, Emergency Medical Service (EMS) teams are mobile medicalized resuscitation teams composed of emergency physician, nurse or anesthesiologist nurse, ambulance driver, and resident. Four types of clinical cases are presented here because they have led these EMS teams to change practices in their management of patients suspected of COVID-19 infection: cardiac arrest, hypoxia on an acute pneumonia, acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation with respiratory and hemodynamic disorders, and upper function disorders in a patient in a long-term care facility. The last case raised the question of COVID-19 cases with atypical forms in elderly subjects. Providers were contaminated during the management of these patients. These cases highlighted the need to review the way these EMS teams are responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, in view of heightening potential for early identification of suspicious cases, and of reinforcing the application of staff protection equipment to limit risk of contamination.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disaster Planning , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Emergency Treatment/standards , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment , Planning Techniques , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL